Close Agent

Reviews flux, accruals, prepaids, and intercompany before controllers sign the period.

  • Trial balance flux vs materiality thresholds with account narratives
  • Accrual and prepaid schedules tied to supporting invoices

Watch it catch a real case.

Synthetic documents, the same steps the product runs. Pause or replay any time.

FinanceAI · Close Agent

Month-end flux and missing accrual

The document arrives. Nothing has been read yet.

Trial balance fluxAug 2026 closeManagement accounts · Illustration · demo dataWaiting
  1. Account 6100 — Professional services · budget $120,000
  2. Actual $158,000 — variance +$38,000 vs budget
  3. Driver note: Lindqvist advisory — invoice not yet received
  4. Supporting PO: PO-8820 authorised $36,000 quarterly
  5. Last accrual posted: July — $9,000
  6. Preparer comment: “Waiting on September invoice.”
Outcome

Accrual journal proposed

A person makes the final call

What it checks.

Month-end close automation.

  • Period-over-period flux with variance drivers linked to sub-ledger detail
  • Accrual proposals for uninvoiced services with supporting PO or contract quotes
  • Prepaid amortisation catch-up when schedules drift from invoices
  • Intercompany imbalance flags with counterparty account references

Try it on your document.

  1. 1

    Upload a trial balance or use the FinanceAI close sample.

  2. 2

    The Close Agent highlights material flux and drafts accrual entries with citations.

  3. 3

    Controllers approve each entry — maker-checker applies before anything posts.

Your team stays in control.

  • Accrual and adjustment entries stay in proposed status until maker-checker approval.

  • Materiality thresholds are configuration, not model guesses.

  • Close checklists show which items still need a human owner.

Why it matters.

Month-end close is a sequence of judgments, not a single button. Controllers need help explaining flux, catching missing accruals, and documenting who approved each entry.

FinanceAI’s Close Agent reads the trial balance, proposes adjustments like the $38,000 Lindqvist Advisory accrual, and ties narratives to supporting documents. Maker-checker approval is mandatory before post.

Use the trial balance sample to see how Stellitron Intelligence quotes evidence while your team keeps sign-off authority.

Worked example on demo data

Professional services expense drops 40% month-on-month while Aster Bank’s Lindqvist Advisory engagement is still active.

The Close Agent proposes a $38,000 accrual for uninvoiced January work, citing the master services agreement cap and last approved timesheet summary in the demo pack.

The controller edits the amount, approves the journal, and records review — the agent does not post unilaterally.

Questions buyers ask.

Does this replace our consolidation tool?

It assists account review and narratives; consolidation systems remain authoritative for group reporting.

Can we map our chart of accounts?

Yes during implementation. Trials use the Aster Bank COA sample.

How does it handle intercompany?

It flags mismatched balances and proposes pairing entries for approval — it does not eliminate legal entity boundaries.

Is SOC 2 required?

SOC 2 Type I is in preparation. Enterprise contracts include your security review and deployment model.

A GOOD PLACE TO START

Bring the ambition.
We’ll build the way forward.

Let’s talk about your project

A conversation about your goals, constraints, and next step.